Now the tabular way I see this relationship is:
Palatablity
|
Satiation
|
Cravings or desires
|
Hyper Palatablity
|
Very low, More please
|
More please
|
High Palatablity
|
Low, more
|
Could eat
|
Medium Palatablity
|
enough
|
enough
|
Low Palatablity
|
Enough already
|
No Thanks
|
Un Palatablity
|
No thanks
|
No way
|
It also suggest that being a foodie is not good for the weight, nor is associating in any way with foodies. They are dangerous to my health.
Who was the old Greek, Epicurus perhaps but no, that talked about a nation destroyed with too much good food, that gave rise to Spartism. Barley porridge, with a an few weed from the ditch (herbs, spices, vegetables), occasionally a dead fish or dead animal on feast days, or a bit of cheese was a feast (the excretions of one animal fermented in the gut of another dead animal). Hunger was and is the best appetizer.
Or is this all just hedonistic adaptation?
No comments :
Post a Comment
please feel fee to comment. Links to other websites are not accepted. Links to related articles are. Negative comments will be delegated with the second finger.